History of Gaslighting: Then vs. Now

Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn X (Twitter) Email

Ever felt like you’re doubting yourself as a mom because someone said you’re “making a big deal out of nothing,” or “too sensitive”? Trust me, you’re not imagining it. Gaslighting—when someone makes you question your feelings or reality—has been around for centuries, and let’s be real: women have always been the main target. Back in the day, moms and women were called hysterical or unstable just for expressing emotions. Today, it shows up in more modern ways, like social media labels—Karen or Pick-Me Girl—that make us feel like our voices aren’t valid.

Doctors, family members, and society at large dismissed women’s experiences, sometimes forcing medical treatments or social restrictions. Women were taught to doubt their own perceptions, leaving them feeling powerless and unheard. Now, online memes and slang trivialize emotions and make women feel like their voices aren’t valid.

In the workplace, assertiveness can be labeled as aggression, and legitimate concerns may be minimized or ignored. At home, an opinion or a feeling may be belittled or undermined. In this post, we’re going to break down what gaslighting looked like in the past, how it shows up today, and why it matters for moms. Because recognizing it is the first step toward trusting yourself, setting boundaries, and showing your kids that their feelings—and yours—matter.

A Brief History of Gaslighting

Gaslighting describes a form of psychological manipulation where someone is made to doubt their own perception or reality. Its roots reflect a longer history of dismissing women’s emotions and experiences—dating back to when behaviors deemed overly emotional were medicalized and used to control women. While the methods have evolved, the core tactic remains the same: undermining someone’s confidence in their own judgment, often disproportionately targeting women.

Historical Gaslighting: Then

The term “gaslighting” originates from the 1938 play Gas Light, later adapted into a popular film, in which a husband manipulates his wife into thinking she’s losing her mind—starting with something as simple as convincing her that the gaslights in their home are dimming when they are not.

The play’s Victorian London setting is significant because it reflects the early era of psychology, when mental illness began to be studied empirically. At the time, a long-standing belief in “hysteria” classified any behavior that deviated from rigid norms for women—modesty, submissiveness, sexual inhibition—as a physical or mental affliction, often tied to their reproductive systems.

While some behaviors might have reflected undiagnosed mental illness, much of it was simply women expressing natural emotions and personalities. Male authority figures—doctors, religious leaders, and others—dismissed women’s experiences, saying things like “It didn’t happen that way,” creating generational trauma and a cultural narrative that female emotions were inherently irrational.

Modern Gaslighting: Now

Gaslighting hasn’t disappeared—it’s simply adapted to today’s social, digital, and professional landscapes. In personal relationships, it appears when women’s feelings are minimized or dismissed with phrases like “It’s not that hard.” or “You’re too sensitive.” In the workplace, it can take the form of colleagues or supervisors undermining contributions, dismissing concerns, or attributing mistakes to supposed emotional instability rather than circumstance.

Women’s assertiveness has long been stereotyped as unnatural, sensitive, or irrational, making them more vulnerable to invalidation. Modern examples include dismissing sexual harassment complaints, emotional labor, or everyday feelings in professional and personal contexts.

Social media has also created new avenues for gaslighting. Slang and memes like Karen, Pick-Me Girl, or even thirsty subtly mock, delegitimize, or shame women for expressing opinions, asserting boundaries, or showing confidence. While these terms are often framed humorously, they echo historical patterns of dismissing women as hysterical, irrational, or unstable.

Modern gaslighting works by shifting attention from the content of a woman’s voice to how she expresses herself, discouraging authenticity and reinforcing gendered power dynamics. Awareness is the first step: recognizing these patterns allows women—and allies—to challenge them, reclaim authority over emotions, and resist social and digital silencing.

Comparing Then and Now

While gaslighting has evolved, the underlying strategy remains strikingly consistent.

Then: Historically, women were labeled hysterical, unstable, or mad for expressing emotions or asserting themselves. Doctors, religious authorities, and family members often dismissed or controlled their experiences through medical treatments, social restrictions, and outright silencing. Women were taught to doubt their own perceptions, reinforcing dependency and limiting autonomy.

Now: Modern gaslighting takes more subtle forms but targets women just as disproportionately. In relationships, it appears as emotional invalidation—“That didn’t happen” or “You never feel that way.” Online, slang, memes, and labels like Karen, Drama Queen, or thirsty trivialize women’s voices, shifting focus from the content of their words to the perceived problem of their expression. In workplaces, contributions may be ignored, and assertiveness may be mischaracterized as aggression or instability.

Despite changes in context and delivery, the pattern is the same: women’s experiences are questioned, minimized, or reframed as personal flaws rather than legitimate responses to reality. Recognizing the parallels between historical and modern gaslighting helps reveal why these tactics persist and how to counter them.

Why it Matters —A Parenting Perspective

When women’s feelings, experiences, or contributions are dismissed, it can lead to self-doubt, anxiety, and long-term stress, making it harder to trust their own judgment. In professional settings, it can undermine careers and limit opportunities; in personal relationships, it can erode boundaries and emotional well-being.

Gaslighting doesn’t just affect women in workplaces or relationships—it also shows up in parenting, both from others and internally. Parents, especially mothers, often face subtle dismissal of their instincts, decisions, or concerns: “That’s not a big deal,” or comparisons like “Other moms handle this better.” Over time, this can fuel mom guilt, self-doubt, and anxiety, making it harder to trust one’s own parenting choices.

Children observe these dynamics too. Modern gaslighting perpetuates gendered power imbalances, reinforcing outdated stereotypes that women are overly emotional, irrational, or unstable. When a parent’s feelings are minimized, children can internalize that emotions are not valid or that speaking up leads to dismissal—perpetuating a cycle of emotional invalidation. Recognizing gaslighting in parenting allows moms (and dads) to trust their instincts, set healthy boundaries, and model emotional resilience for their children. By validating themselves and their experiences, parents can create a home environment where feelings are respected, communication is honest, and children learn that their voices matter.

Final Thoughts

Gaslighting is not a new phenomenon—it’s a centuries-old strategy with roots in gendered oppression, amplified in new ways by social norms, digital culture, and workplace dynamics. From hysteria to Karen, the goal is often the same: undermine confidence, silence voices, and maintain power structures.

Understanding the history and recognizing modern patterns empowers women and allies to challenge dismissive language, assert authority over their own experiences, and push back against the subtle and overt tactics that aim to make them doubt themselves. By naming gaslighting and seeing its evolution, we can start shifting conversations toward validation, respect, and equity—online, at home, and in society.

History of Gaslighting —Then vs Now